Camcorders: DVD vs MiniDV?
I'm mostly worried about trait of footage and not whichever is more convenient to use or more cutting frame.
Answers: MiniDV.
Think of it this way; MiniDV is roughly 13 GB/hour. A regular DVD holds 4.7 GB of notes. It's a different compression standard, and DVD is crushed more than DV is. Therefore, DV gives the better feature. Generally speaking about video, within regards to directory size...the bigger, the better.
How many professional camcorders use DVD? I can't conjecture of any. Some DV camcorders are often used for professional job, though.
DVD uses "interframe" compression, in which the information of most frames has some reliance on notes in other frames. Therefore, if you remove some frames within editing, it can affect the quality of others. Think of it as a chain-link wall; when you remove a link, the paling still holds up, but it sags a bit at the point where you removed the connect.
DV uses "intraframe" compression, in which respectively frame is compressed independently of all others. So, if you remove frames contained by editing, other frames are unaffected. This is more close to a picket fence; remove a picket, and the other pickets are still standing like peas in a pod way they did back.
With ALL other factors mortal equal, DV comes out on top. It might take for a moment longer to capture, but I'd stick beside it.
for standard definition, miniDV is 720x480 and DVD is 640x480. The same miniDV tape can account HDV which uses the same MP2 compression used by DVD for soaring definition. so basically the characteristic is about indistinguishable for video with a slight frame for tape because cassette can handle a superior data rate. For audio characteristic miniDV in the 2 drain mode is uncompressed 48k audio, doesn't get much better than that.
The answers post by the user, for information only, CeQnA.com does not guarantee the right.
Related Questions :