Entry-level dSLR or a zoom camera?
If i buy a Nikon D40, i would hold to settle on the kit lens for I can't afford a zoom lens or any other lens. On the other paw, I can have a high-zoom lens and collect some money if I go for the Canon S3 or S5 IS for it cost smaller amount than the Nikon D40.
I've already read some reviews regarding those cameras and I already own an idea on what both can do. Actually I'm already to inclined to buy the Nikon D40, but I'm not too smug with the utensils lens and at the same time I don't enjoy extra bucks to immediately upgrade it.
Answers: I respectfully disagree next to the other answers you've received so far, but only because of budget.
When budget is not a concern, they're right. Buy the DSLR.
But when money is tight, a zoom camera is repeatedly a better choice. The problem, as you've already pointed out, is that once you blow your budget on the camera, you're without lenses. You're also minus memory cards, extra batteries, chargers, camera oodles, flashes, and more.
A good all-purpose camera approaching the S5 has a lens that will cover 95% of the photos you'll want to give somebody a lift. (For instance, I do some youth sports photography; I use a DSLR with a 1.6 focus length multiplier and a 100-400mm zoom, for an forceful zoom of about 13X. The S5 is a 12X zoom, and costs roughly $2500 less than the equipment I use.)
The advantages to a DSLR are frequent, if you need those advantages. I use mine beside studio strobes, and need to sync them adjectives. I also use several wireless Canon flashes when doing real estate photography. I stipulation the no-lag shutter when doing sports photos. If you're exploring digital photography for the first time, you really don't need any of those things.
In my judgment, the extra expense isn't worth it. You end up camera rich and auxiliary poor, and you end up not self able to give somebody a lift some of the photos you want because you don't have adjectives the equipment you need to do it -- and isn't that why you're buying the camera surrounded by the first place?
Even with utensils lens, D40 will blow away any point-and-shoot.
It's a no-brainer.
Hope this helps.
Get the D40 and don't look stern! The image ability os so much better that you won't believe it. You might be able to "zoom within the computer" to rival the S5 images.
Maybe not right immediately, but soon enough you will be capable of afford another lens. The 55-200 VR is "only" $250, so that's not too far out of reach. This is still not as long a tele as the S5, but again - the portrait quality will probably frustrate that.
Besides, with the S5, you are stuck near one lens forever. Hey, it's a great camera for what it is, but it is what it is.
~~~~~~~~~
SAMPLES
~~~~~~~~~
Here is an example of what I was chitchat about. The S5 indication is at an equivalent of 432 mm at ISO 80. The D40 sample is at an equivalent of lone 68 mm at ISO 200. Try to open a windowpane for each example. It's a pain within the butt, but you will be able to really compare side-by-side. Move your cursor over respectively image and click to expand to view them full size. Do not overlook the purple fringing on the S5 logo. Which image part would you prefer? At what price?
S5-IS: http://dpreview-img.fotki.com/gallery/ca...
D40: http://dpreview-img.fotki.com/gallery/ni...
JBT makes a suitable case- check out the Panasonic Lumix line, close to the FZ-18- read some reviews, Can't go wrong next to a stabilized Leica lens! Also check out the Fuji and Sony super-zooms. One other major positive aspect of a super-zoom P&S is video capability- if you like to lug any video, then a dSLR is not your choice, as none currently hold out video capability. I find for things approaching travelling, that I like to shoot clips of musicians or other interesting things, so I resembling the all-in-one aspect.
Having said that, today I went and bought my first dSLR! I'd be shooting with a Panasonic FZ-10 for a few years, and contracted it was time to trade name the jump. So after reading every review on every camera inside my budget, I chose the Olympus E510- stabilized sensor, excellent dust-removal system, and Live View, so you can compose through the LCD, something very few dSLR cameras are skilled of. I shoot ninety percent of my pics through the viewfinder, but there are abundant time when having the talent to compose through the veiwfinder is extremely useful- some macro work, shooting from odd angles, or shooting while holding your camera away from your body. Also, the live viewpoint is better suited for infrared, something I want to experiment with. Here's a quote from Wrotniak's site:
" The E-510 have one significant advantage contained by infrared photography: it allows for direct, electronic scene preview on the LCD monitor, something impossible on most digital SLRs (except for a few models by Olympus and the Canon EOS D1 Mk. III).
This means that surrounded by order to rob a picture in infrared it is no longer indispensable to do the image composition lacking the IR filter, and only consequently (with the camera on a tripod, of course) put the filter on, and actually release the shutter, taking the filter sour and repeating the procedure every time the camera was re-pointed. This is a great plus."
I read the reviews on every site I could find, looked at hundreds of photos on Flickr, etc, and granted that the image element was excellent, and the features be exactly
what I were looking for, and the tools lenses are probably the best available. There are a few inherent differences with the four-thirds sized sensor, but nought that I feel would sway me into a Canon or Nikon. And any 4/3 lens from any businesswoman is compatible. You can also get a lens adaptor to use elder lenses, although you lose autofocus capability. So I enjoy to disagree with those who say aloud not to choose Olympus based on lens choice. I a moment ago got an E510 next to TWO awesome kit lenses for $800.00. But, again, it depends on what you will use your camera for.
Here is the straight information for adjectives kind so cameras.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/recommen...
D40 doesn't hold in body auto focus, you will enjoy to buy those expensive auto focus lens.
pentax k 100d super is a cheapest DSLR. almost the price of canon G9
The answers post by the user, for information only, CeQnA.com does not guarantee the right.
Related Questions :