Professional position digital camera for non-flash photography??
Answers: I shoot NBA & WNBA games (indoors without flash) and use a duet of Nikon D70's, currently replaced by the D80. Here are some shots taken at the recent WNBA Playoffs with my 6mp camera, using a Nikon 18-200mm VR & a Nikon 75-300mm zoom. I used ISO 1600 near the lenses wide unscrew with the maximum shutterspeed to appropriation the action. The similes were cropped and resized back uploading.
http://www.spmsportspage.com/images/wnba...
And here are some more, taken from high surrounded by the stands of the stadium at the recent Cal vs. Tennessee game. I be using a Nikon D50 (recently replaced by the D40) and shooting with my 18-200mm VR lens. ISO settings range from 400-1600 as the light dimmed that evening. Photos be also cropped and resized before uploading.
http://www.spmsportspage.com/images/coll...
I love my Nikons and importantly recommend them. Remember, my cameras are 'old and outdated' surrounded by the minds of many. But I guess they do pretty in good health, right?
For a novice, I'd recommend the Nikon D40, D40x, or D80, dependent upon your budget. Then look at the great unusual 70-300mm VR lens. The VR (vibration reduction) feature virtually eliminate the need for a tripod!
Some more info for you here on shooting sports:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/sports.h...
If you enjoy any other questions, please ask.
I hope this is conscientious for you.
I've taken some great indoor flashless shots with a short time ago my Nikon D-70. A more professional grade would be the Nikon D-200.
You want a digital SLR where on earth you can choose the lens to suit the occasion. There are lenses that are much better within low light and this is what the pros that you see are using.
If "money isn't an issue" for definite, I'd suggest that you look at the Nikon D200 or Canon 30D. I own the D200 (as do many of our member here) and you can do a lot near this camera. It has sufficiently hasty continuous shooting for all but the most hard-core professional sports photographers. That's the best mode to capture doings like this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstei...
or this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstei...
Here are my stock answer on the D200 and a bit of comparison between the D200 and 30D:
~~~~~~~~~~
Nikon D200
There are others, but when I made the outcome about my dream camera when I considered EVERYTHING, I chose the D200. I have owned a number of other digital cameras and finally settled that it was time to buy "simply the best" camera available, regardless of the cost. For me - and various others in the tangible world - this meant the D200. It doesn't weigh 5 pounds and I don't requirement all the features and burst presentation that a professional sports photographer might demand.
The one and only other "real world" consideration, as far as I am concerned, be the Canon EOS 5D. I already owned 3 exceptional Nikon lenses, though, so my choice was clear. Not to mention, the Canon 5D costs just about twice as much. Even in "the sky's the limit" buying, relative worth still counts.
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/nikond20...
http://www.steves-digicams.com/2006_revi...
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d200.ht...
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/1844/cam...
http://www.popphoto.com/cameras/2402/edi...
See this comparison of the Nikon D200 vs. the Canon 5D. Each camera has its advantages.
http://www.digitalcamerainfo.com/content... [Note the navigation menu implicit the top of the review]
I have a few photos on Flickr taken beside the D200 and various Nikon lenses. Go to my page at http://www.flickr.com/photos/samfeinstei...
~~~~~~~~~~
Nikon D200 vs. Canon 30D
You will get hold of many intense responses to this question. I own a Nikon D200 and plead guilty that the Canon 30D is an equally competent camera. When you get to this height, you should have your own individual preferences developed to the point that you would really enjoy to just travel to a camera shop and handle both cameras to see which one you prefer.
If you be in motion hear and spend an hour clicking on all the links, you will see that Ken Rockwell - a huge Nikon disciple - says that in that is no difference in the final product.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/dslr-com...
This mode that YOU have to dance to a camera shop and pick up both cameras and see which one feels the best to you. My choice be the D200, but I'm not you and you might like the lighter-weight Canon better.
~~~~~~~~~~
If you choose one of these, please come support and ask about lens inspection for sporting events for that specific brand.
I agree with Dr. Sam, but instead of the Canon 30D you should check out the Canon 40D next to a 6.5 f/s
And get yourself some apt VR/IS lenses with f stops of 2.5 or more
I enjoy a Canon XTi DSLR, no shutter delay and I believe the 8MP XT is within the same class...NO SHUTTER DELAY.
Try www.bhphotovideo.com demos, reviews and a complete Professional staff on appendage to answer all your question.
As far as I know all of those pocket digitals and point and shoot digitals enjoy a shutter delay..or..fill time.
"Money isn't an issue"
Are you sure? Coz if that were true afterwards you need to check out the 10mp/10fps 1D Mk.III ($4500 for the body) or the upcoming 22mp/5fps 1Ds Mk.III ($8000 for body).
But thats basically the body and that takes fastidiousness of good high-ranking ISO performance presently you need to supply some lens that excel in low bedside light performance. This technique you are looking at a constant aperture f/2.8 lineup. Something like the 300mm f/2.8L IS ($3,900) or even the 400mm f/2.8L IS ($6,500).
This is the sort of gear that professional sports photographers would be using on the side lines of professional sporting events.
If money really isn't an issue next the only downside is individual able to physically fetch this equipment (it gets heavy) and if thats not an issue you will be tough pressed to find a better set up from even Nikon. Others may think otherwise but 11fps within DX mode (5.1mp) on the FF D3 and just 64 frames surrounded by 9 fps JPEG mode (donno how many contained by RAW) really makes one consider about how several corners have be cut to get # close to what Canon already have. Oh and there is no VR within the 300mm f/2.8.
Off course you can "climb down" from this set up to something like the 40D if you want 6.5fps at 10mp (or even some Nikon combination), but if you really want the best emblem quality (pro) later you need to hold really good lenses and within is nothing better out in attendance.
ahoj
It depends on O B J E C T I V
(-:
It's not exactly the camera that is taking the pics. It's that they are using an SLR within manual mode controlling the apertureand shutter and ISO rating to draw from the non-flash pics.
You can do this with digital or show SLR camera.
Film Camera I reccommend Nikon N90s, F100, F6
Digital Camera I reccommend Nikon D200, maybe D80.
For setting indoors lacking a flash, the place should be lit up pretty good. For digital be in motion with these settings and consequently adjust as you see the pics.
ISO rating 1600...shutter speed 1/125 maybe 1/60...aperture f/5.6 I don`t know f/4
It's best if money is no object to move about for a fixed aperture zoom lens of f/2.8 www.samys.com has flawless prices ands excellent info on their photog stuff.
The answers post by the user, for information only, CeQnA.com does not guarantee the right.
Related Questions :