Does the Monster Ultra 1000 HDMI cable provide better picture competence over the Ultra 800?
Answers: Theoretically maybe, but practically, no.
Some respondents are wrong ... within are differences among HDMI cables, but the cross-question is do you need the better point for your application? In most cases the answer is no. See the first link.
The solitary advantage to Monster over other cable -- in most applications -- is the upgrade warranty (and possibly the (questionable among knowledgable people) cachet of being competent to say "I use Monster".
But you can reclaim significant $ and get a cable that works every bit as very well (and even better) for a lot smaller number money. See the second link.
As a comparison:
2 m Monster 1000 -- $129.95
7 ft BlueJean BJC Series-1 -- $33
And the BJ cable is arguably better.
No.
There is also really no quality difference between a Monster Ultra anything (or any other lofty priced HDMI cable) and a $5 HDMI cable from some no-name brand.
Audiophiles will claim they can hear a difference between cables but those kind of audiophiles are, generally, partially out of their minds.
The only article you may (and this is in an extreme crust where you're doing something unconventional like running the cable directly across a live 220 volt main) see as a difference between the two is a suscepibility to interference, but even specifically pretty unlikely.
Save yourself $40 and buy a cheap HDMI cable, you'll never know the difference.
yea ,pacifica is right.they are just a bunch of bullshit..purely
get an average priced one,and that will do the living
The answers post by the user, for information only, CeQnA.com does not guarantee the right.
Related Questions :