Which is more High-definition : 1,DVD-Audio , or 2, SACD ?
Answers: I assume you be a sign of high definition nouns. See the links for info on the two formats.
Both are multichannel formats and both are superior to normal CDs. Which is -- contained by theory --"sophisticated definition" can be debated (I'll be honest and utter to my ear the best of each format sounds darn good), BUT surrounded by practical terms tons DVD-A recordings (and probably SACD recordings too) fail to unite the potential of the format, so which is higher fidelity surrounded by fact a bit than theory is a more valid cross-question. I have a celebration number of both types and frankly I can't say one is better than the other from a nouns quality perspective (although both are, to my ear, better than typical CDs).
For many the multichannel format of SACD or DVD-A is a bigger and more lucid benefit than improved fidelity over compact disc. Put simply, many listeners don't hold equipment (and arguably the "ear") to appreciate the superior sound.
For anything reason both formats are pretty much a non-player today. DVD-video is arguably the more successful multichannel format ... possibly due to the presence of both audio and video. Then again, most consumers are pretty happy beside MP3s .... so fidelity is clearly less critical than convenience.
Hope this helps.
Neither of these is a video format - they are nouns only, so 'definition' is not really relevant.
Since both formats never really took rotten, it's a bit difficult to compare. Some people grain that DVD-A is better, some people articulate they prefer SA-CD.
The answers post by the user, for information only, CeQnA.com does not guarantee the right.
Related Questions :