Which is better an ipod or a mp3 player ?
Answers: Flash MP3 are the best in vocabulary of bang for the buck. True, they cannot store more than 16GB at the moment, but they are cheaper and definitely have nouns quality that is to say just as upright. Additionally, with IPods, you are locked within to content that only Apple can provide. iPods become a hit since they were the first to the bazaar with illustrious capacity storage for portable music. Now that players are universal, you are better off next to an open format fairly than a closed proprietary format. As an example, if you bought a cd, loaded it into iTunes on your computer (the Apple program for transferring music to the iPod), lost the CD and considered necessary to burn it back down to cd, you can't. With regular MP3 format you can do doesn`t matter what you want with your music. I in recent times would rather stick to technology that doesn't lock me within to one company. Secondly, the rechargeable battery contained by the iPod doesn't last forever. I believe it last for approximately 500 charge cycles. Once you recharge from empty to full 500 times, you own to send the iPod to Apple for them to replace the battery-operated and it is expensive ($60 with shipping). This is of late another example of being locked into the technology. Sandisk as an example have a rechargeable battery but it is user replaceable and intensely cheap ($20). Compare on Yahoo Tech and CNET and see which MP3 player works best for you with adjectives the reviews, pros and cons. Good Luck.
If you buy a regular iPod with the harddrive, I wouldn't reccomend it. They break really well. iPod Nanos or other flashdrive-type models are better, and last longer next to less problems. And it really depends on the KIND of Mp3. I suggest an iPod nano, though. They're the best.
The answers post by the user, for information only, CeQnA.com does not guarantee the right.
Related Questions :