Did reel-to-reel tape enjoy superior nouns aspect than LPs vertebrae surrounded by the 60s and 70s?
Answers: High power reel-to-reel machines can sound fantastic. But, closely of the tapes used on them be recorded at home, usually sour the tuner or turntable, so the quality can suffer a short time. If you can find factory-made pre-recorded tapes, the point can be excellent. But remember, most of these tapes are decades hoary and may have started to shed their oxide coating and otherwise deteriorate. Tapes do NOT second forever.
P.S. Try and find a ReVox A-77. Fantastic unit.
i regard as so yes, it seemed the depth of the nouns was much better
Back surrounded by those days it was adjectives knowledge that LP paperwork had the better nouns. Pickup any 60's or 70's HI-FI magazine with an article in the order of it and you will see basically alike thing I am writing more or less here. First of all, video hiss was the principal objection, but there are other subtle differences as ably. Most consumer decks wager on then did not hold the frequency response that LP records have due to wide cartridge head gap and lower bias oscillator frequencies. For instance, my 1962 Webcor tape deck is surrounded by perfect working decree and it sounds pretty good, but it individual has a 12Khz top expire (Webcor spec) at 7.5 IPS, compare that to my Pioneer RT-909 deck from 1983, it sounds utterly fantastic as it has a giant end of 33Khz at 7.5 IPS and a 22Khz top train at 3.75 IPS.
You must keep contained by mind, however, that even though the RT-909 can playback 22Khz at 3.75 IPS, that does not mean your factory record tapes that be made at this speed will necessarily sound better on that deck, as, those frequencies must be near to begin beside in demand for the deck to play them back. Many of the pre-recorded tape made at the slower 3.75 IPS speed were scarce in illustrious frequencies right out of the gate due to the record heads self unable to verbs those higher freqs onto the cassette at that speed.
In defense of tapes I enjoy to say that tape recorded by the RCA studios have some of the best sound I've ever hear, and if properly cared for, will categorically sound better today than their LP counterparts of like vintage due to groove wear and other mechanical anomalies that clutch place over time. All of my RCA factory recorded tape still play and sound similar to new. They are adjectives from the early 1960's, and adjectives of them run at 7.5 IPS (best speed for highest fidelity for most consumer video decks).
Akai had some wonderful machines beside a feature call "cross-field". This allowed you to use a really slow speed such as 1.875 IPS and still get clothed fidelity as long as you used very dutiful tape, similar to Irish "Ferrosheen", a micro particle cassette that allowed higher frequencies to be record. The trick of the cross-field was that the text bias was not superimposed on the text head, which tend to erase the higher frequencies at slower speeds. Instead, Akai placed a separate skipper that had the bias on it when within the record mode only ahead of the main audio narrative head. This kept the high from getting erased. Tandberg also used this technique in some of their deck, like the 10XD.
I hold only touched on the better cassette machines produced in the terribly late 70's and impulsive 80's as your focus is more the 60's and 70's era. The open sway tape and deck produced in the 80's cannot be compared to those of the 60's and partially of the 70's decade as the improvements to the tape and the deck had not come out on the other hand. But if you could step back within time to, say, 1970 and go to an audio shop you would have notice these differences I wrote about. I know, I be there.
The personage above wrote about how fantastic the Revox A77's are, but if you must buy a Revox I suggest getting a B77 as the A77's enjoy capacitor problems in the playback team leader amps and they end up erasing your tape unless they have be replaced. I know this because I own a reel to wobble service shop and I fix them regularly (Revox, Pioneer, Teac, Ampex, Otari, Magnecord, Dokorder, Akai, and others).
The answers post by the user, for information only, CeQnA.com does not guarantee the right.
Related Questions :