Is in that a method to produce non-HDTV channel not look so crappy on an HD TV?
Answers: TomJohn2 makes a apposite point.
However, if the single coming in is strong and clear the results will be dependent on the TV itself. Some HDTV's or really dutiful at compensating for the resolution differences, some are not as good, and some are freshly garbage. From what I hold seen pet name brands (ie Sony, Samsung, Panasonic, etc) tend to do a better job than most rotten brands (ie Vizio, Envision, Akai, etc.). This is not to say that adjectives name brands will engineer the picture look great or that all the sour brands will make the picture look fruitless, you'll have to check them out. Also viewing standard def channel in the wrong aspect ratio ( viewing 4:6 on a 16:9 screen) will craft the image stretch out to fit the edges of blind. This can be fixed by adjusting the aspect ratio.
Depends on the settings available on the HDTV.
I own a magnavox LCD hdtv and the non-hd channels look pretty accurate. I think I own the settings on 4:3 stretched (ask your cable or satellite technician what would be the best setting).
the problem is that a lousy signal looks even worse at 1080p than 480p. it has a great deal to do with the signal. it's resembling the the computer axiom gigo, garbage surrounded by garbage out. if you own a really good sd tv and you study a hd signal, it will improve the picture.
it's adjectives in what you gain signal wise.
The answers post by the user, for information only, CeQnA.com does not guarantee the right.
Related Questions :